When do experts think human-level AI will be created?
On the whole, experts think human-level AI is likely to arrive in your lifetime.
It’s hard to precisely predict the amount of time until human-level AI1 An AI that is capable of transforming society, as drastically as the industrial revolution or even more so.
Aggregate predictions:
-
AI Impacts’ 2022 survey of 738 machine learning researchers produced an aggregate forecast of 50% by 2059.
-
As of June 2024, Metaculus2
has a median forecast of 2031 for “the first general AI system” and a median forecast of 2027 for “weakly general AI”. Both these timeline forecasts have been shortening over time.Metaculus is a platform that aggregates the predictions of many individuals, and has a decent track record at making predictions related to AI. -
This website combines predictions from different forecasting platforms into a single (possibly inconsistent) timeline of events.
-
In January 2023, Samotsvety’s forecasters estimated 50% probability of AGI by 2041 with a standard deviation of 9 years.
Individual predictions:
-
In a 2023 discussion, Daniel Kokotajlo, Ajeya Cotra and Ege Erdil shared their timelines to Transformative AI. Their medians were 2027, 2036 and 2073 respectively.
-
Connor Leahy, CEO of Conjecture, gave a ballpark prediction in 2022 of a 50% chance of AGI by 2030, 99% by 2100. A 2023 survey of employees at Conjecture found that all of the respondents expected AGI before 2035.
-
Holden Karnofsky estimated in 2021 that there was “more than a 10% chance we'll see transformative AI within 15 years (by 2036); a ~50% chance we'll see it within 40 years (by 2060); and a ~⅔ chance we'll see it this century (by 2100).”
-
Paul Christiano estimated in 2023 that there was a 30% chance of transformative AI by 2033.
-
Yoshua Bengio estimated “a 95% confidence interval for the time horizon of superhuman intelligence at 5 to 20 years” in 2023.
-
Geoffrey Hinton also predicted 5-20 years in 2023, but his confidence is lower.
-
Shane Legg estimated a probability of 80% within 13 years (before 2037) in 2023.
-
Leopold Aschenbrenner predicted in 2024 that AGI happening around 2027 was strikingly plausible.
Models:
-
A report by Ajeya Cotra for Open Philanthropy estimated the arrival of transformative AI (TAI) based on “biological anchors”3
. In the 2020 version of the report, she predicted a 50% chance by 2050, but developments in AI in the two years that followed pushed the 2022 version of herestimate to 2040.The author estimates the number of operations done by biological evolution in the development of human intelligence and argues this should be considered an upper bound on the amount of compute necessary to develop human-level AI. -
Matthew Barnett created a model based on the “direct approach” of extrapolating training loss that as of Q2 2024 outputs a median estimate of transformative AI around 20534
.Based on the final graph titled “Cumulative probability distribution over TAI”.
These forecasts are speculative,5
Further reading
- Epoch’s literature review of timelines
We concentrate here on human-level AI and similar levels of capacities such as transformative AI, which may be different from AGI. For more info on these terms, see this explainer. ↩︎
Metaculus is a platform that aggregates the predictions of many individuals, and has a decent track record at making predictions related to AI. ↩︎
The author estimates the number of operations done by biological evolution in the development of human intelligence and argues this should be considered an upper bound on the amount of compute necessary to develop human-level AI. ↩︎
Based on the final graph titled “Cumulative probability distribution over TAI”. ↩︎
Scott Alexander points out that researchers that appear prescient one year sometimes predict barely better than chance the next year. ↩︎
One can expect people with short timelines to be overrepresented in those who study AI safety, as shorter timelines increase the perceived urgency of working on the problem. ↩︎
There have been many cases where AI has gone from zero-to-solved. This is a problem; sudden capabilities are scary. ↩︎